Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 20 November 2008 16:24, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: >> > Is there are reason to change tux_path[] to *tux_path? >> >> We are allocate it by alloc_path(), so it's not array actually now. > > You can still declare it as an array function parameter, which is > good documentation. But it's not very important important. Should > I pull now?
Yes, it is same on parameter completely. Maybe it's just my habit, if it's actual array - foo[], and it pointer to array - *foo. Well, it's not very important. However, I'd like to use one of those, because current code has both of those. I care about it. If you like foo[], I'll change all of those. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Tux3 mailing list Tux3@tux3.org http://tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3
