On Wednesday 11 Mar 2009 5:33:10 pm Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Wednesday 11 March 2009, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > > Daniel Phillips <[email protected]> writes: > > > Please take a look at this repository and see if the history looks ok: > > > > > > http://phunq.net/files/tux3git.tgz > > > > It seems there is 3 kind of your email address. > > > > Author: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]> > > Committer: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]> > > > > I guess it is not good. Especially Signed-off-by, [email protected] is > > mailing-list address, not yourself. > > > > Thanks. > > Whoops :-) > > I guess I better fix them all to be [email protected]. > > By the way, I gave up on the subtree import idea, too many strange > things happened. I now just import straight into Linus's git tree. > Should Tux3 be on a branch? Would that make it easier to extract > a full Tux3 patch? >
I think it's much better if you just clone Linus' repo and just keep adding to it - which can become the tux3 master from which everybody else pulls. It will also help you sync up with Linus' repo again - because that will be added as remote tracked branch. Just my 2cents.. :) Kunal > Regards, > > Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > Tux3 mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3 _______________________________________________ Tux3 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3
