Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:29 +0900 > OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > - When 'bh' is known to be non-NULL, use put_bh() rather than brelse(). >> >> It sounds strange. Almost all bh is non-NULL. This means we are going to >> replace almost all brelse() by put_bh()? >> > > Well.. you can make up your own mind about this. If you see benefit > in the NULL-checking and extra debugging which brelse() provides then > continue to use brelse().
I thought someone started to convert it. Ok, personally, I think NULL-check is just not needed always, and if it is needed, check it explicitly. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Tux3 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3
