On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Tom Wolper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:41 PM, David Bruggeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The source and the calendar. There are two Thursdays and three Saturdays >> open between now and the election. Should she not become the VP-elect, why >> would anyone care if she comes on SNL? > > Everybody knows who she is, which is a baseline for celebrity. And if > nothing else, she's become a celebrity. If the GOP loses, she can also > do some no-talking-points appearances like Al Gore and Bob Dole did, > where everybody comments on how natural and funny they are when not > campaigning. > > I'm going to predict that Sarah Palin will eventually end up on Fox News.
I still think she is helped politically more playing against SNL then playing on SNL. If she does go on the show I think it will be less in the self-depreciating way, and more in the kidding the kidder kind of way. I see her as really being a northern version of Katherine Harris (though I don't think she has her out-boobed). I think she will run for the house seat from Alaska (which is maybe more powerful than being a senator from Alaska) and then self-destruct in some kind of embarrassing intelligent design, Alaskan independence, Know-nothing bru ha ha. But yes, after that, Morning Show co host on Fox News, definitely. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Like TV only smarter. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
