Sir Tom, to Kevin: > And this little numbah: > http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=10575534
Damn, now I'm disgusted (see my reply to Kev's Rachel Zoe post) Jim Ellwanger, to Kevin: > > Because, when you think of supermodels, WalMart leaps almost > > immediately to mind. > > Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart. > > http://theslot.blogspot.com/2008/12/is-wal-mart-now-walmart.html > (Executive summary: A company's logo is not a company's name.) Yeah, what they're referring to in the latest ads must be the dot-com. We're still waiting for 'em to take those [EMAIL PROTECTED] stars off the stores in Nazareth, Bethlehem, Pohatcong et al. -- BOB ____________________________________________________________ Free information - Learn about Criminal Lawyers. Click here. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/PnY6rw3dDDXeJgicYKSvaO791X4Gn1kwZ9iYm1yVWY1FiYgIZmuqP/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Like TV only smarter. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
