On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Bob in Jersey <[email protected]>wrote:

> The Winter Games lost $223 mil, but cable revenue was up in first
> quarter '10:
> http://snurl.com/vjdlu
>

This is what jumped out at me, buried near the end:
"Sherin also pointed to a 45% ratings improvement in the 10pm time slot amid
Jay Leno's move back to his lead late-night spot, a schedule shuffle made
easier with the promotional platform of the Olympics."

This is about what my own tracking of the 10:00 slot for NBC suggests, but a
few questions remain unanswered here. With all the emphasis NBC placed on
justifying reduced ratings for Leno with even more greatly reduced costs,
shouldn't we now be getting some measure of how much more costly the 10:00
pm hour (or other hours if material was shifted to 10:00 to cover) is for
NBC to program, vs Leno? In other words, for the 45% improvement in ratings
to be good news, wouldn't it also have to be true that the increased costs
of replacement programming were less than 45%?

The other omission that surprised me was any mention of contribution to
revenue in the 1Q from the late night segment. How much to The Tonight Show
make 1Q 2010 vs 1Q 2009, and 4th Q 2009? Seems like NBC would be wanting to
blow the horn about this a bit.

My TV was tuned to the CBS Morning show today and they ran a piece on Conan
going to TBS; their backgrounder was a simple something like: "Conan, fired
earlier this year by NBC because of horrible ratings...". Score that a
victory for the NBC-Jay Leno PR machine. If I had to write a short intro for
that piece, it would have been more like: "Conan, fired earlier this year by
NBC because of Jay Leno's horrible ratings at 10:00..."

-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en

Reply via email to