A few thoughts popped into my mind thinking about the topic and reading the
thread. It has taken me a few days to sort it out enough to write out the
thoughts.

1. This clearly is a post-Ebersol NBC move. Ebersol would only pay out big
bucks for sports if they had a broad appeal or there was some angle to
reach a broad audience. The EPL broadcasts are only going to reach a
relatively tiny audience in the US and NBC seems okay with it. For as long
as I can remember, which for me means going back to the 1970s, any time
ther was a move to make soccer more accessible, there were comments, often
written with a sneer, about somebody's delusion that soccer was going to
compete in popularity with the major American sports. The last instance I
remember was when the LA Galaxy signed David Beckham. In this case I
haven't seen any comments (though there were other things in the news) so
NBC made the deal with no pretense of "bringing soccer to America." I
assume they figure if they get the rating ESPN live baseball gets they can
make money.

The point is that NBC paid out a lot of money for rights to games knowing
that they will have a niche audience. They are not going to Americanize the
sport or broadcasts and they are not loading up on the hype.

2. NBC chose EPL over MLS. In the discussion over making soccer a
mainstream sport for TV, it has been a solid rule that Americans would not
root for, nor pay attention to non-Americans. The conventional wisdom has
always been that the way to build American interest in soccer was to give
people local teams to support and they eventually would seek out the top
level of play in the world. So step one has always been to build up the
MLS. NBC believes that they can generate sustainable interest showing
English teams with English announcers. I assume the choice for EPL
recognized the lack of language barrier and that city names/team names
sound normal. So they chose the English league rather than Spain, Italy,
Germany, Brazil, or Argentina.

3. This shows me that live TV now has a premium value. We have been hearing
for years about the disruption that came with DVRs and now we can see that
a network values live events and how much they are willing to pay for them.

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to