I was about to bring up the "Evil Leaper", and the implication that Satan 
was somehow behind her mucking with history...

I don't recall if Ziggy's voice was audible through the handlink (since we 
only heard what Sam could hear), but I believe we heard the computer's 
voice at PQL headquarters.  And I remember a running gag about Sam 
programming it with Barbara Streisand's ego.
On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 6:18:32 PM UTC-4 Dave Sikula wrote:

> Exactly. The Waiting Room was one of the reasons they were able to track 
> down where Sam had leaped to and figure out why he was where he was (the 
> Buddy Holly episode excluded); that it wasn't "anywhere on the planet at 
> some time between the mid-80s and the present." I seem to remember one 
> episode where the person in Sam's body escaped and they had to track him 
> down.
>
> Did Ziggy ever talk beyond beeps when Al would hit his Lego unit? Gushie 
> talked, but Ziggy?
>
> As for other leapers, have we all forgotten the Evil Leaper? (I wish we 
> could, but she's canon.) That, and the meddling with actual events (like 
> the JFK assassination), were kind of a signal to me that they were running 
> out of ideas.
>
> I also miss the "oh, boy"s, and hope they're not replaced with the "oh, 
> sh--" we got in the first cliffhanger.
>
> I realized the other day that, as much as I liked the show, it's really 
> something of a ripoff of DC's Deadman.
>
> --Dave Sikula
>
> On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 01:38:00 PM PDT, M-D November <
> [email protected]> wrote: 
>
>
> Maybe I get distracted by the little things, but...did it bother anyone 
> else that the Waiting Room never got mentioned?  In the original series, 
> one of the reasons Al didn't show up until the middle of Act 1 was because 
> he was usually questioning the time-swapee in the Waiting Room, and I don't 
> feel like it was EVER mentioned in the pilot, despite the larger presence 
> of the project team.  Also, why doesn't Ziggy talk anymore?
>
> I will say that I'm glad the production design recognized that the vision 
> of "THE FUTURE" from the original series wasn't practical to replicate. 
>  Waaaaaay too much neon.
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 4:01:10 PM UTC-4 PGage wrote:
>
> Since I expected it to be horrible I came away mildly impressed that it 
> was less bad than it could have been. I think the two leads are strong and 
> promising. 
>
> It does have that performative ultra diverse stance that made ST: 
> Discovery so tiresome, but I would not blame that for the substantial 
> talent drop off after the two Leads. Most network shows that are all white 
> cast mediocre and forgettable actors after all. It does feel like they are 
> missing a fierce Latinx character, a guy in a wheel chair, and either a 
> super smart male nerd or super smart hot babe from the Sub Continent to 
> fill out their Diversity Bingo card. Yawn…but then, every generation has 
> its self indulgences. Millennials like to think they roam in well 
> represented diversity packs, even though the truth is most 30 years spend 
> most of their time with people from their own ethnic group.
>
> I will watch a few more episodes, if only out of respect for the pleasant 
> memories of hours I spent canoodling with my then new wife while watching 
> the original. But even more than the self congratulatory diversity 
> enactments, I am dreading what appears to be the now irresistible 
> overarching conspiracy plot line…
>
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 at 7:53 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The CGI is distracting… there are too many sets and effects that aren’t 
> practical. It’s a decent first story, but the cast seems to have been 
> chosen more for diversity than for talent. That said, Raymond Lee has the 
> potential to be a good lead. It is not as bad as it could have been, but it 
> is also not as good as it could have been.
>
> Streaming on the Peacock 
> -- 
> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>
> -- 
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4BXa--4bzRYDatMuSE1M4qXzrGENMNfYcCQVC36E6ArHA%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4BXa--4bzRYDatMuSE1M4qXzrGENMNfYcCQVC36E6ArHA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> -- 
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
> Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tvornottv/4jdCqfxkS4o/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/99d65e8b-9bbb-4bb6-b9ac-186ea2944c1an%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/99d65e8b-9bbb-4bb6-b9ac-186ea2944c1an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/dff3b1ba-1449-46d6-979f-863bac841793n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to