On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:32:59AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Should we isolate that support from the rest of the code where > > possible for the sake of keeping the rest of the code clean of things > > like the protocol changes Forest affectionately refers to as "dumb and > > dumber"? And lastly, should we name these seggregated files > > appropriately? ;) > > Keeping it seperate so that we don't clutter up the tree would be nice, > since nehahra is mostly NQ based anyway and we've been trying to keep > the NQ/QW trees in sync. They should be src/nehahra or something > similar, but I doubt the names (while entertaining) are very 'proper' > (notice I didn't say appropriate, because they are, they're just not > 'proper') :>
Awww, half the point is having the filenames. Nobody really cares if we
do or don't support Nehahra mode, the whole point is in making a statement
about how totally lame that support is, but that we've got it anyway.
I've not yet added software fogging to the code because it's basically a
big change. I have an idea or two how to do it, but want to discuss it
with Forest a bit to ensure that when it's done, it is done the same way
as DarkPlaces in an attempt at least surprise for the players. Either
way, it's a post-0.2.0 thing.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Crazy in the coconut
<Overfiend> Thunder-: when you get { MessagesLikeThisFromYourHardDrive }
<Overfiend> Thunder-: it either means { TheDriverIsScrewy }
<Overfiend> or
<Overfiend> { YourDriveIsFlakingOut BackUpYourDataBeforeIt'sTooLate
PrayToGod }
msg00885/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
