Hello, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > I prefer rely on python-mechanize instead of mechanize in twill source > code (cleaner IMHO)
I agree it's cleaner, and it's the ultimate goal -- but these modules look young and not very stable yet. Got to handle them breaking. > I didn't notice this bug, sorry, but you should read[0] where the upstream > said > that it should work using python-mechanize. Well, now we have a functional test :-) Maybe saving a copy of that webpage and pointing twill at it would be enough. > I don't manage ubuntu package of twill, only the debian one. So that's what the Uploader: header means! Got it. > feel free to open a bug on the Debian BTS and I will work on it ASAP. No worries, I'll delve into it; I still don't know which module causes the problem. Gonna do some binsearch on it this weekend. _______________________________________________ twill mailing list [email protected] http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/twill
