I think you are right. Not sure why anybody would get fixated on Turbo C, not like it is lovable. Emacs is older than Turbo C, and better.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, manish kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > i think is criticizing turbo c software, not the C language itself. > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Zubin Wadia <[email protected]> wrote: > >> C isn't really that evil. Many purists will say C++ has more flaws than C. >> >> Just because Java and C# dominates today doesn't mean every university >> should embrace that for all classes. >> >> I was fortunate enough to be taught in Pascal, C, C++ and Java at my high >> school and University. >> >> Java only because it was hot in 2000 - most of the data structures and >> algorithms work was still C++ and I am thankful for it. >> >> So you can criticize your school for not exposing you to the trendiest >> languages but I would take a curriculum in pure C over a curriculum in pure >> Java any day. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Zubin. >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:13 PM, sai krishna <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> ya i from klu they r still using the turbo c. >>> >>> D.r.s.sai krishna >>> Msp-klef university >>> >>> --- On *Tue, 1/12/09, riazrahaman <[email protected]>* wrote: >>> >>> >>> From: riazrahaman <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [twincling] any body from KL University in twincling >>> To: [email protected] >>> Date: Tuesday, 1 December, 2009, 5:59 AM >>> >>> I just came to know that at KL University they are still using turbo C to >>> teach C to students. >>> >>> Wasn't this obsolete way back in stone age? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Riaz Ur Rahaman >>> >>> Joan >>> Crawford<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/joan_crawford.html> - >>> "I, Joan Crawford, I believe in the dollar. Everything I earn, I spend." >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! >>> Homepage<http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_yyi_1/*http://in.yahoo.com/> >>> . >>> >> >> >
