On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:26:52PM -0700, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> We've been having a severe lag problem at Chesspark that we've been
> slowly tracking down over the last month.  It was hard to find because
> it only happened in long running instances, and never happened in our
> test cases.
>
> [..]

Yes. This is a known issue: http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/1652.

> Attached is a very small patch that fixes this problem as long as a
> response is received for the IQ stanza.  If no response is received,
> it still leaks, but I understand this is fixed by t.w.p.j.xmlstream.IQ
> using a timeout.  We'll switch to that soon, but this patch will help
> others who haven't.

The patch I attached there is more or less the same, but I should look
into the issue that Christopher mentions. It'd be nice to follow up via
the ticket.

> I would appreciate if someone could add documentation that it still
> leaks in this case, but shouldn't be a problem in general.

When I commit this patch, I will add documentation.

In general I would like to mention that filing a ticket in Trac for
problems like this makes it easier for me to keep a tab on things that
need to be done.

On the other hand, for questions or discussion about
anything related to the Jabber bits in Twisted this is the preferred
forum. I appreciate the recent message increase on this list, so keep
that up. Also, I'd like to point out some of the developments I've been
working on in my sandbox [1], the XMPP subprotocols branch [2] and the
S2S branch [3]. If anyone would care to take a look and see how those
things affect them, that'd be great.

[1] http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/browser/sandbox/ralphm
[2] http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/browser/branches/xmpp-subprotocols-2178-2
[3] http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/browser/branches/xmpp-s2s-2320

Not that branches have a ticket number encoded in them, too.

--
Groetjes,

ralphm
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Jabber mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.ik.nu/mailman/listinfo/twisted-jabber

Reply via email to