On 2011-02-08, Jason Heeris wrote: > On 8 February 2011 11:46, Stephen Thorne <[email protected]> wrote: > > Um, that's what I mean, you shouldn't be using .acquire() or .release(), > > just .run(). doSerialStuff doesn't need a reference to the semaphore > > object. > > So... how can I update the property and emit the signal upon > acquisition and release? Or are you saying I should stick with what I > had?
I totally misread your example, and I appologise. I've read it now and it looks fine to me. The only commend I'd make is that you probably want DeferredLock not DeferredSempahore if this is serialised access. -- Regards, Stephen Thorne Development Engineer Netbox Blue _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list [email protected] http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
