On Feb 15, 2014, at 5:32 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On 15 Feb, 07:58 pm, [email protected] wrote: >> >> The one thing that confused me was that the sample program appeared to be >> running the program only once a second, and waiting for it to complete >> before running it again. > > I think it's more like 81 processes once a second and *not* waiting for them > to complete before starting over. Notice the lack of yields in key places. > I suspect inlineCallbacks has gradually eaten out the part of your brain that > recognizes that keyword. ;)
I sort of noted this on the ticket, but I think the idea of using KQueue to address this would be great. Is there a similar thing we might be able to do on Linux to get rid of the dependence on a SIGCHLD handler? -g
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list [email protected] http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
