> On Aug 7, 2016, at 4:03 AM, Adi Roiban <a...@roiban.ro> wrote: > > > > On 7 August 2016 at 00:50, Glyph Lefkowitz <gl...@twistedmatrix.com > <mailto:gl...@twistedmatrix.com>> wrote: > > [snip] > > You always have to follow the compatibility process - if it's not a security > bug, we would have to change the process first :-). But if you want to > follow the exception path rather than the deprecation path (this message > doesn't qualify, because the subject is incorrectly formatted) I certainly > don't have any objection. > > > As pointed by Craig in the PR, dist3.py is used by > https://github.com/habnabit/twisted-depgraph > <https://github.com/habnabit/twisted-depgraph>. I will revert the dist3 > change.
I should point out that the entire point of twisted-depgraph is to help Twisted developers - basically, you and Craig - understand the dependencies remaining and port more things to py3. So I'm pretty sure Aaron would not mind at all if he had to update it :). It's not really a user-facing application, just a core developer tool. > With this email, I just wanted to get an initial feedback and try to > understand why we have code split between setup.py and dist.py > > I will come back with an email following the compatibility process. > > Thanks! No problem! I have a little tool that imports dist3 myself, and it is _super_ encouraging to see the percentages of ported code these days. -g
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python