On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 03:02:57PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> Using PyNaCl as an X25519 alternative seems unfortunately difficult,
> as it only exposes a wrapped version of X25519 which isn't quite what
> we need,

Though after I wrote this I see that nacl.bindings.crypto_scalarmult
exists and should do roughly what I need there, although it's not clear
to what extent it's a private API.  That's maybe tolerable for something
that's only for compatibility and can eventually go away.  I don't think
this changes the analysis about testing, though.

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwat...@debian.org]

_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
https://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python

Reply via email to