On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:41:50 -0500, Markus Schiltknecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
your answer was quite a 'hammer' for me. I've slept over it and though a
lot about it. Up until now I've been a firm believer in the 'render each
URL segment as a child of another segment'. Especially with HTML::Mason,
I've done quite some websites, which follow that architectural
principle. Thus questioning that is quite hard for me.
My apologies if my tone was too harsh, but I have some pretty deep-seated
opinions about web application design, and I tend to express them with a
certain degree of fervor. No offense intended.
Anyway, I'm willing to learn. And I like to question things, so I have
decided not to give up, but to try to do it the nevow way (yes, without
that ContainerPage thing).
Thus I think neither Valentino's efforts nor yours are all wasted. And I
hope he, you or other nevow hackers still has enough patience to answer
my questions.
I really appreciate you taking the criticsm so positively, that's a really
excellent response, and one I should practice more often myself.
I'm a bit busy today, but I will respond in greater length about why I do
not care for the "every URL segment is a template" design approach, and
what I prefer to do instead.
Also, thanks for actually reading up on Zope Acquisition and WSGI issues;
I'll try to explain where I think they go wrong.
L. Daniel Burr
_______________________________________________
Twisted-web mailing list
[email protected]
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-web
