Thank you, John.... It is just my opinion, maybe for next version can be done if developers accept it, because of me, and maybe others love this framework, and great thanks for them....
We hope this framework can be the best bootstrap. In my experience, I try minimize as possible using third party plugin, framework or code in my project, except I master the code and framework influence. And for the first time I found this bootstrap, surprise!, I like this, and take conclusion that I will used it for my project next time. And I hope day to day this framework can be developed and has innovation as better. Yes, maybe we can say" If you like this you can use as TOC, if not leave it and go away", but we don't say like this, but we should like say "We like this as much" :D I am sorry it is just my opinion.... On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:39 PM, John Roberts <[email protected]>wrote: > Why is everyone so insistent lately that everything is > named/done/specified incorrectly? Bootstrap is a framework, very > graciously provided for our use. Elements that you don't like can be > freely changed to match the requirements of your own project, that's the > beauty of the framework! > > > On Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:32:08 AM UTC-7, Saiful Amri wrote: >> >> Hello... >> >> I think for standard and consistency, class name of *alert-block *maybe >> could be named as *alert-warning*, the reason is look at class of * >> label-warning* and class of *badge-warning*, they are using same color >> and same last name. So why *alert block* using different last name? >> >> Thanks.... >> >
