Actually the display:block; in #footer is not needed - It's already in
bootstrap:

 Phil DoughtyWeb Designer / Guitarist Phone: +971 50 8879936





On 14 June 2012 19:21, Phil Doughty <[email protected]> wrote:

> You just need a footer? try adding the red markup:
>
> <!doctype html>
> <head>
>   <link rel="stylesheet" href="
> http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/assets/css/bootstrap.css";>
> <style>
> #A, #B, #C, #D, #E, #F, #G, #footer{text-align:center;}
>   #A{background:#ccc;height:72px;margin-top:20px;}
>  #B{background:#ddd;height:128px; float:left;}
>  #C{background:#eee; float:right;}
>  #D{background:#888;height:92px;}
>  #E{background:#999; float:left;}
>  #F{background:#666;position:relative;top:-92px; float:right;}
>  #footer{background:#000;color:#fff;display:block;}
>  .row-fluid [class*="span"] {margin-left: ???%;}
> </style>
> </head>
> <body>
> <div class="container-fluid">
>  <div class="row-fluid">
> <div id="A" class="span12"><h2>A [span12] (ad)</h2></div>
>  </div><!-- /row -->
> <div class="row-fluid">
>  <div id="B" class="span2"><h2>B [span2] (logo)</h2></div>
>  <div id="C" class="span10"><h2>C [span10] (navigation bar)</h2></div>
>  <div id="D" class="span6"><h2>D [span6] (anouces)</h2></div>
>  </div><!-- /row -->
> <div class="row-fluid">
>  <div id="E" class="span8"><h2>E [span8] (content area)</h2></div>
>  <div id="F" class="span4"><h2>F [span6] (sidebar)</h2></div>
>  </div><!-- /row -->
> </div><!-- /container -->
>
> <div class="container-fluid">
> <div class="row-fluid">
>  <div id="footer" class="span12">
> <p><small class="pull-right">© About a year ago till - 2012
> AK-47AlmostPerfect.com - Most Rights Reserved.</small></p>
>  </div>
> </div><!-- /row -->
> </div><!-- /footer -->
>
> </body>
> </html>
>
>
>  Phil DoughtyWeb Designer / Guitarist Phone: +971 50 8879936
>
>
>
>
>
> On 14 June 2012 17:48, 0zz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> well, now, because of negative positioning, we have a big gap under
>> all blocks ((
>> "clear: all" for footer "SPAN12" doesn't help (
>
>
>

Reply via email to