would be handy but it can be done in a limited way via the search on twitter.
On Jan 2, 1:03 am, mozTom <tob...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wouldn't mind if one could submit multiple in_reply_to_status_ids, > like with commas or something, so that instead of having @user1 @user2 > @user3, the system knows (if you set an i_r_t_s_i, you don't even need > the @user, it will show up in their replies box). This way it doesn't > look spammy and provides the maximum amount of characters. > > On Dec 31 2008, 4:53 pm, "Chad Etzel" <jazzyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Agree++; > > > I think any mentions should be delivered somehow... either to "Replies" tab > > or a new "Mentions" tab or something. One can search for their username on > > search.twitter (or tweetgrid :D), but i bet most people miss their mentions > > because it doesn't occur to them do so... > > > -chad > > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Peter Denton <petermden...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > Honestly, I think its a very good idea, as when you have businesses > > > blasting, you don't want them to individual sends, as it will make the > > > timeline look spam-centric, whereas multiple mentions looks nice. > > > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Alex Payne <a...@twitter.com> wrote: > > > >> We've considered changing it such that any mentions of a user's > > >> screen_name are delivered to the reply timeline. We'll let you know > > >> if we do. > > > >> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 09:47, Peter Denton <petermden...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > Hello, > > >> > Just curious if the twitter system will eventually deliver multiple @'s > > >> in a > > >> > single status to all those @'d. As I understand it now, it delivers the > > >> > first @, IF it is the first string in the status, and all other @'s > > >> > wont > > >> > reach a reply inbox. Do you plan to change it? > > > >> > Peter > > > >> -- > > >> Alex Payne - API Lead, Twitter, Inc. > > >>http://twitter.com/al3x
