clickjacking does not really affect pages like http://twitter.com/britneyspears. whatever... I understand you got to protect yourself from misuse.
On Mar 30, 5:38 pm, Alex Payne <a...@twitter.com> wrote: > Not until the clickjacking problem is solved by the browser vendors. > End of story. > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 14:31, Ryan <ryan10...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I can see that twitter recently has inserted a (graceful) iframe > > buster which clears out the html. Why is twitter in iframe such a bad > > thing when the content is public anyways - the rss feed of the content > > is available for consumption? > > > I know about the clickjacking attack, but that unnecessarily penalizes > > the good applications. Any thoughts on allowing twitter pages in > > iframes through registered usage? > > -- > Alex Payne - API Lead, Twitter, Inc.http://twitter.com/al3x
