OK, thanks for the clarification. Will migrate asap. Arnaud.
On Apr 29, 2:10 am, Doug Williams <d...@twitter.com> wrote: > No excuses. Thanks for calling it Chad. > > statuses/replies is an alias to statuses/mentions. statuses/replies will not > be going away but we would prefer you to use statuses/mentions if at all > possible. > > Thanks, > Doug > -- > > Doug Williams > Twitter Platform Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Chad Etzel <jazzyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Um.. can we get a do over on that post, please? I think we got the > > gist, but just to make sure that nothing was lost in translation > > (since I'm spotting a few typos/omissions)... > > > Thanks, > > -Chad > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Doug Williams <d...@twitter.com> wrote: > > > With the change from @replies -> mentions we the statuses/replies method > > to > > > statuses/mentions. Rest assured statuses/mentions will still be > > available, > > > but to reduce confusion and promote the new standard we removed > > > statuses/replies in favor of statuses/mentions in the documentation. In > > > other words statuses/replies is now a hidden alias to statuses/mentions. > > > > Thanks, > > > Doug > > > -- > > > > Doug Williams > > > Twitter Platform Support > > >http://twitter.com/dougw > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Arnaud <arnaud.meun...@twitoaster.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > > > >> I just noticed the /statuses/replies method was not mentionned anymore > > >> on the Twitter API wiki. It's quite disturbing, as I didn't see > > >> anything in the changelogs. Is this method deprecated? Is it going to > > >> be? Or is it some kind of symlink to /statuses/mentions ? > > > >> All the best, > > >> Arnaud.
