As far as I know it is the new reality, at least for
the foreseeable future.
Thanks,
Doug


On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Joe Fernandez <joey.fernan...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> Is this something that is going to be fixed or get better in the near
> term or is this the new reality?
>
> On Jun 5, 10:05 am, Doug Williams <d...@twitter.com> wrote:
> > The index has been shortened considerably to help reduce the replication
> lag
> > that is causing some search machines to fall behind.
> > Thanks,
> > Doug
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Joe Fernandez <joey.fernan...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hey Doug,
> >
> > > We are seeing search limited all the way down to about 7 days right
> > > now.  Is this true?
> >
> > > This is causing a lot of problems with our app.
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Joe
> >
> > > On Apr 27, 1:33 pm, Doug Williams <d...@twitter.com> wrote:
> > > > From #6 on Things Every Developer Should Know [1].
> > > > Search API Limit
> >
> > > > Clients may request up to 1,500 statuses via the page and count
> > > parameters
> > > > for the search <http://apiwiki.twitter.com/search> method. The
> response
> > > to a
> > > > request exceeding this limit will be a status code of 200 and an
> empty
> > > > result in the format requested. This artificial limit is in place to
> > > ensure
> > > > the performance of the search system. We also restrict the size of
> the
> > > > search index by placing a date limit on the updates we allow you to
> > > search.
> > > > This limit is currently around a month but is dynamic and subject to
> > > shrink
> > > > as the number of tweets per day continues to grow.
> > > > 1.
> http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Things-Every-Developer-Should-Know#6Therea.
> > > ..
> >
> > > > Doug Williams
> > > > Twitter API Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw
> >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:47 PM, explicious <avail4...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > is that really supposed to be "dominoes" (sic) ?
> >
> > > > > > days ... example: search "dominoes pizza".  I searched this on
> 4/17
>

Reply via email to