> No, frankly, I didn't put 2 and 2 together on the piece of info you're
> looking for; the XML aspect of your subject confuses focus.

Well, sorry about that ... it's referred to as the "xml format" in all
of the API docs, and it has no DTD or XSD schema to infer a better
name from. so that's how i referred to it -- for future reference, is
there some other name people use to refer to that format option on
this list?

> in-memory. That scenario has simply never been a problem for me. A
> minor amount of additional work and resources required, but the
> server-side business-centric apps I work with have a lot of state to
> begin with.
>
> I wouldn't mind seeing full XML info available in the search API, but
> it doesn't seem like much of a stretch to separately retrieve and
> cache that sort of info either.

I have no problem maintaining state, i am happily maintaining all the
state and history i can about the user est i'm interested in -- and
i'd even be willing to maintain state about every tweet ever to
twtiter that refers to one those users by name ... if there was an
easy way to get that info.  But fetching each of those tweet
individually seems ridiculous and prohibitive, especially since all my
app cares about is tweets that are replies -- there's no way to filter
on that type of information using the search API, so most of the
individual tweets i have to retrieve (one at a time) don't even have
the data neccessary to make them worth maintaining state about.

your example of caching user data is one thing: it's trivial to cache
all the metadata about a finite set of users, but you can't cache
tweets that haven't happened yet.

Reply via email to