thanks - i'll change my client code! Joseph Cheek jos...@cheek.com, www.cheek.com twitter: http://twitter.com/cheekdotcom
JDG wrote: > Those will, so long as they haven't actually been suspended. As for > your other question, you would only receive mentions from protected > accounts that you were following (i.e. accounts to which you had access). > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:35, Joseph Cheek <jos...@cheek.com > <mailto:jos...@cheek.com>> wrote: > > > will they be included in statuses/mentions? > > Joseph > > Hwee-Boon Yar wrote: > > Along the same line, updates from accounts considered spamming > > wouldn't be included in search results too. > > > > -- > > Hwee-Boon > > > > On Sep 17, 12:07 am, JDG <ghil...@gmail.com > <mailto:ghil...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >> I believe that search does not return statuses of protected > users (even when > >> authenticated, though I may be wrong and should be corrected if > I am). In > >> that case, yes, you could potentially receive fewer results than > >> statuses/mentions. > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:56, Joseph Cheek <jos...@cheek.com > <mailto:jos...@cheek.com>> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Quick q: > >>> > >>> is there any time that a search for a screenname won't return > every > >>> tweet that statuses/mentions will? i can see that it would > return more, > >>> but will it ever return less? > >>> > >
