??????????????????????????????????? were is my information????????????????????
2009/9/26, Michael Steuer <mste...@gmail.com>: > > Twitter actually announced versioning along those lines during the > "API 2.0" developer track session at #140tc. > > > > On Sep 25, 2009, at 8:08 PM, "Jim Renkel" <james.ren...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> +1. For this and other reasons the API should be versioned. >> >> Jim Renkel >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: twitter-development-talk@googlegroups.com >> [mailto:twitter-development-t...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Scott >> Haneda >> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 21:28 >> To: twitter-development-talk@googlegroups.com >> Subject: [twitter-dev] Re: SERIOUS Problem With Cursors In JSON >> Followers/Friends Ids >> >> >> Why is the API not versioned then? api.twitter.com/?v=1, >> api.twitter.com/?v=1.1, api.twitter.com/?v=1.2 etc >> >> Or, if that is too much maintenance, how about >> api.twitter.com/?bitfix=32 or whatever. >> -- >> Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ * >> >> On Sep 25, 2009, at 6:40 PM, JDG wrote: >> >>> and it would also break everyone who CAN handle 64 bit ints and >>> expects >>> results in decimal numeric format. >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 16:01, Richard <ryt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Can this not be returned as hex or base64? >>>> It would save bandwidth for Twitter (and us) and make it a string >>>> people could convert it to 64bit int if they still want to. >>>> >>>> On Sep 25, 10:16 pm, Scott Haneda <talkli...@newgeo.com> wrote: >>>>> I would not change either. But there are those here that are >>>>> stating >>>>> they need new hardware to work around this issue, and that they can >>>>> not afford that. I was trying to be that voice of reason if that >>>>> is >>>>> the road/excuse they are choosing to go. >>>>> >>>>> There seem to be acceptable workarounds, solid proposed >>>>> workarounds, >>>>> etc. I guess I am not getting it, JSON is just a string returned, >>>>> yes, it can represent type of data, but it is still just a >>>>> string. I >>>>> can not see it being that huge a performance hit to massage that >>>>> string a bit once you get ahold of it. >>>>> -- >>>>> Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ * >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:02 PM, jmathai wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It's ridiculous to suggest a change in hardware (64 bit) or >>>>>> software >>>>>> (switch from PHP) to use Twitter's API. It's not like either of >>>>>> these >>>>>> are archaic. It sucks, sure, but it's silly to suggest such a >>>>>> "solution". >>>>> >>>>>> BTW, I don't have this problem. I'm just trying to be the voice of >>>>>> reason. >>> >> >> >
