Nice logic Chad... Especially the way you parsed that expression into all permutations.
Regards, N S On 9/29/09, Chad Etzel <c...@twitter.com> wrote: > > Uh, I guess it was unclear from the subject/body split of the question > what exactly was meant... > > "How do I get the user_id for a screen_name WITHOUT using a > rate-limited call or one with authentication." > > ...can be read: > > How do I get the user_id for a screen_name without using a rate-limited > call? > And, how do I get the user_id for a screen_name without using one with > authentication. > > ...or, it could be read: > > How do I get the user_id for a screen_name without using a rate-limited > call? > Or, how do I get the user_id for a screen_name using one with > authentication. > > I read it the first way, due to the subject/body split... > > Boolean algebra, ftw? > > -Chad > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> You can make any of the REST API calls with authentication. >> Abraham >> >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 22:10, Andy Freeman <ana...@earthlink.net> wrote: >>> >>> using a rate-limited call or one with authentication. >>> >>> I'd be (mostly) satisfied with an analog to http://twitter.com/al3x in >>> terms of user-id. >> >> >> >> -- >> Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org >> Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham >> Project | http://fireeagle.labs.poseurtech.com >> This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private. >> Sent from Madison, WI, United States > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
