Does this list have non-member moderation enabled? Having that on
helps block most of the spam bots that troll google groups.

Josh

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Chad Etzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It's not that *this* list is a target. It's that *every* list is a
> target. The cost to send spam is practically zero, so it would take
> more time and energy to decide what lists *not* to spam. The sad thing
> is that it works and is obviously profitable, otherwise it would have
> stopped long ago.
>
> -Chad
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Scott Haneda <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I do not really understand their motivation, 99% of the groups out there are
>> not going to be susceptible to spam.  Most groups are tech, or at least,
>> highly niche, and the people on it are going to know it is spam.  Most
>> groups are filtered into a folder, there are just so many red flags.
>>
>> Spammers are a strange group.
>>
>> How come this list is such a target?  I am on some other google groups,
>> larger than this by a fair degree, and this does not happen.
>> --
>> Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ *
>>
>> On Oct 19, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Jeffrey Greenberg wrote:
>>
>>> This looks just great... can't wait to try itj
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Peter Denton
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would say, considering I can only recall a few spam posts getting
>>>> through, you guys [sic] do a great job.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Chad Etzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why yes we can, and we do... loads of it.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem is that these spammers are spoofing the "from" address of
>>>>> list owners who usually get automatically posted and skip the
>>>>> moderation step. This is a flaw of the way Google Groups handles
>>>>> incoming posts, and not of the group admins.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Chad
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Dave Briccetti <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Google group admins can actually DELETE spam, too, which would be
>>>>>> nice.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to