The search team is aware of the problem, I'll let you know when we have more info.
---Mark http://twitter.com/mccv On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:38 AM, andy_edn <andygup....@gmail.com> wrote: > RE: Couldn't find Status with ID=7406995447 > > I'm wondering if the geocode search API is completely dead? It started > to go out intermittently yesterday, now it's completely out. Any help > would be much appreciated since we want to demo this app. > > It's throwing a 404 {"error":"Couldn't find Status with > ID=7406995447"}. We've tried this from various IP addresses and it > doesn't matter. I'll include the request and exact error dump below. > The example I use below was taken directly from the Twitter API > documentation on this page. > > To reproduce: I took the following URL from that page and tried to > load it using a browser: > http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitter-Search-API-Method%3A-search > > GET /search.atom?geocode=40.757929%2C-73.985506%2C25km HTTP/1.1 > > HTTP/1.0 404 Not Found > Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:34:36 GMT > Server: hi > Status: 404 Not Found > X-Served-From: sjc1c004 > Content-Type: application/xml; charset=utf-8 > X-Served-By: sjc1i009.twitter.com > Content-Length: 111 > Vary: Accept-Encoding > Cache-Control: max-age=5 > Expires: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT > X-Varnish: 327593908 > Age: 0 > Via: 1.1 varnish > X-Cache-Svr: sjc1i009.twitter.com > X-Cache: MISS > Connection: close > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <hash> > <error>Couldn't find Status with ID=7406995447</error> > </hash> > > > > > On Jan 2, 9:03 pm, John <munz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I recently switched from using page to max_id to prevent duplicates >> from appearing due to new tweets. But there seems to be an issue when >> hitting the end when doing a search. It results in an error of >> "Couldn'tfindStatuswith ID=[id of tweet]". The id that gets >> returned in the error also doesn't match the ID that I passed in. I >> can reproduce it everytime. >> >> To reproduce: Do a search for "#tests" then take the ID of the last >> tweet and do another search using that as the max_id. >> >> Also search and favorites API methods does not list "max_id" as a >> parameter but they do work correctly with max_id besides the issue >> above. Shouldn't they be included in the docs? >