One of our teammates came up with the idea of having a cooperative twitter interview. For our site we interview artists/producers. However we want our users to feel a part of the site as it grows by allowing them to interact as much as possible. With this in mind, another project would be to create a twitter/facebook login page that would (again) force the user to sign in. After signing in the user automatically follows us on twitter, and updates their status to a pre- defined text that we choose. Once they login, they will be able to view a form that will be used to leave a quick little question for the upcoming interview. Once they submit their question their twitter/ facebook status is updated to let their friends know: "@someone just left an interview question for @singer at: http://link.com Get your question answered!" The public questions will be stored in a thread format on that page.
On Mar 19, 1:24 pm, TheN2S <thenext2sh...@gmail.com> wrote: > John, > > Another idea we came up with would be sort of like an Artificial > Intelligence Twitter account. Anyone can ask it a question. Keywords > are extracted from that question, and the Twitter account replies back > with a pre-defined @reply message. Would this idea conflict with the > twitter terms of use? > > On Mar 19, 1:01 pm, TheN2S <thenext2sh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > John, > > > Thanks for pointing that out! I will have a chat with my team and see > > how we can avoid this conflict. > > > We do have another simple project that we want to get off its feet! > > Lets say we premiere an exclusive new song on our site. However to get > > to the song, users must login through twitter/facebook. While they > > login they are automatically set to follow @ouraccount and it > > automatically posts a status update on their account "Currently > > checking out the brand new song for Sinatra!http://link.com";. Once > > that is done, the user is forwarded to the appropriate page that they > > originally intended to. If they don't sign in, they miss out on the > > release. This doesnt seem to be going against any terms of service... > > right? > > > Once again, contact us if you are able to complete this > > project:http://bit.ly/9CSUc0 > > (all css/html is handled by us. We simply need the motor to power up > > the project. We take care of all the aesthetics.) > > > On Mar 19, 9:27 am, John Kalucki <j...@twitter.com> wrote: > > > > This sounds a lot like @reply > > > spam:http://help.twitter.com/forums/10711/entries/64986 > > > > If you are replying to followers, maybe that's OK, and maybe it isn't. > > > But, > > > if you are @replying to everyone, you will be suspended. > > > > -John Kaluckihttp://twitter.com/jkalucki > > > Infrastructure, Twitter Inc. > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:26 PM, TheN2S <thenext2sh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I am looking for a twitter developer that is able to use the API to > > > > respond back to tweets containing a specific quote. Lets say for > > > > example an artist YXZ has just done a rendition of "New York" by Frank > > > > Sinatra. We want to @reply every user that mentions "York" & "Sinatra" > > > > in their tweet with a customized reply such as "I see you like > > > > Sinatra's original New York song.. but have you checked out ZYX's new > > > > version?" It's a simple concept, and it has been done already. > > > > > Please also be aware that twitter has an API limit that we don't want > > > > to disturb. > > > > > We are in need of a developer to move this project forward. Please > > > > contact us back using this form:http://bit.ly/9CSUc0 > > > > > Thanks! (= > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to twitter-development-talk+ > > > > unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words > > > > "REMOVE > > > > ME" as the subject. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to twitter-development-talk+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
