What gave you the impression that Google was connected to LOC's archive? As far as I can tell the two archive programs are seperate and Google's data is only available from when they started getting the firehose.
Abraham On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 14:11, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <zn...@comcast.net>wrote: > On 04/18/2010 01:48 PM, John Kalucki wrote: > > The LOC will not provide programmatic access to the archive of a type > that > > you seek. At the moment we do not have a solution for this common > request. > > We're waiting on a major infrastructure upgrade before we can prioritize > > this request among all other priorities. > > > > -John Kalucki > > http://twitter.com/jkalucki > > Infrastructure, Twitter Inc. > > The impression I got from the press releases was that Twitter was simply > handing the tweets off to Google and that *Google* was developing all > the indexing, search and API technology in conjunction with the Library > of Congress. Is that incorrect? > > -- > M. Edward (Ed) Borasky > borasky-research.net/m-edward-ed-borasky > > "A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems." ~ Paul > Erdős > > > -- > Subscription settings: > http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/subscribe?hl=en > -- Abraham Williams | Developer for hire | http://abrah.am PoseurTech Labs | Projects | http://labs.poseurtech.com This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private.
