> > Not to be glib, but they are more than welcome to join in on the >> conversation in the community. We plan to let the community really drive >> this one. >> >> ReadWriteWebs's Co-Editor, Marshall Kirkpatrick, suggests today that >>> Twitter intends to leave the annotation classification system to be >>> determined by the market. >>> http://bit.ly/csK8Od >>> >>> Although I appreciate that Twitter values keeping the annotation >>> ecosystem open for innovation and adaptation, I hope the conversation >>> on Linked Data metadata standards within Twitter annotations is just >>> beginning. >>> >>> It could be an historic lost opportunity if the hard driving Twitter >>> team doesn�ft step back and consider soliciting the counsel of the W3C, >>> >>> Sir TB-L, Nigel Shadbolt and others in the Linked Data community. >>> After all, Metaweb's Freebase team is just 3 blocks away. >>> >>> >>> Raffi, > > Is is a Wiki or some other publicly accessible shared document space where > the What, Why, and How of Twitter's Structured Annotations is being > developed?
there will be soon! taylor and i will work on getting a page up. -- Raffi Krikorian Twitter Platform Team http://twitter.com/raffi -- Subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/subscribe?hl=en
