Hi John,

I appreciate the offer, and I'm excited about user steams.  I attended your 
talk about it at chirp.

But I'm afraid I don't have the resources to invest in experimental development.

When everything's settled and user-streams are a reality I'll join the crowd.

isaiah
http://twitter.com/isaiah

On Jun 29, 2010, at 7:24 PM, John Kalucki wrote:

> Isaiah,
> 
> I'm assuming your client is Kiwi, a desktop client. Are you interested in 
> participating in the User Streams beta test for desktop clients? User Streams 
> are not subject to the same rate limits that the rest of the API must adhere 
> to. 
> 
> We're currently lining up clients to start the beta test in the next few 
> weeks. Basically, you'll need to implement oAuth and follow the guidelines 
> (http://apiwiki.twitter.com/User-Stream-Implementation-Suggestions) to get 
> ready for a limited private test for a few hundred users. For capacity 
> planning purposes, we'll also need to understand how many users to expect 
> during a public beta and how many installed copies you have.
> 
> Let me know if you'd like to participate.
> 
> -John Kalucki
> http://twitter.com/jkalucki
> Infrastructure, Twitter Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:30 PM, isaiah <isa...@mac.com> wrote:
> 
> Given that Raffi told us that that Rate Limits would be going to 10X
> by chirp -- it almost sounds like a joke now, but he definitely seemed
> serious -- we designed features that were already constrained at 350
> calls/hr.
> 
> Now at these dramatically lower limits, even with dynamic adjustments,
> many features are failing regularly and our customers are screaming.
> 
> Clearly cutting features from our app is pretty much the only way
> forward.  However we were already having trouble trying to maintain
> some semblance of feature parity with Twitter.com -- which is what our
> users are demanding.
> 
> With the failures and changes combined our users are going to be
> marching with pitchforks very and torches looking for heads to chop
> very soon.
> 
> I'm not asking for any specific action here.  Merely passing along the
> anger that we see just in case you weren't aware of it.
> 
> Isaiah
> 
> 

Reply via email to