I guess unless you are allowed into the new twitter you account
doesn't have access to this API. I am getting a 401 unauthorized
currently.

On Sep 20, 9:37 pm, Vega <edgardo.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wow! Thanks to Abraham and Taylor for the quick replies. I will
> cautiously try the new api.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edgardo
>
> On Sep 20, 7:05 pm, Taylor Singletary <taylorsinglet...@twitter.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Outstanding. I hadn't even realized this particular API was being made use
> > of yet here.
>
> > This, and a number of other interesting new APIs are being documented and
> > readied for wider use now. Any little fun bits you find in advance are fair
> > game, but until they are documented their behavior, response, and
> > availability may fluctuate wildly. Keep in mind that #newtwitter's
> > availability is being gradually rolled out primarily in respect to
> > scalability, performance & monitoring -- this is also true of the newer
> > APIs. Until they are announced, please keep any usage of undocumented APIs
> > cautiously low.
>
> > Taylor
>
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The related_results/show/status_id method is returning replies to a
> > > status_id.
>
> > > Screenshot in the new UI:http://www.flickr.com/photos/4braham/5009432215/
>
> > > API call:
> > >http://app.apigee.com/console/apigee-console-snapshots-1283317200000_...
>
> > > Abraham
> > > -------------
> > > Abraham Williams | Hacker Advocate |http://abrah.am
> > > @abraham |http://projects.abrah.am|http://blog.abrah.am
> > > This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private.
>
> > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 15:30, Taylor Singletary <
> > > taylorsinglet...@twitter.com> wrote:
>
> > >> Hi Vega,
>
> > >> #newtwitter uses the same API pattern available to all developers for
> > >> this. When a status contains an in_reply_to_status_id field, then it is
> > >> considered a reply to a preceding status, which is then fetched by
> > >> requesting the particular status referenced by in_reply_to_status_id.
>
> > >> This is why you'll see that the implementation in #newtwitter doesn't 
> > >> list
> > >> *replies to* the current status, but instead the original status that
> > >> sparked the reply-to. These can be chained but in many cases can never 
> > >> show
> > >> the whole picture easily.
>
> > >> It would great if we had a statuses/:id/replies method to return all
> > >> statuses that reference the original status -- would be very useful in 
> > >> this
> > >> context.
>
> > >> Taylor
>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Vega <edgardo.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > I have heard the new Twitter only uses the api to display information
> > >> > if so how does it get Replies to this Tweet?
>
> > >> > Cheers,
>
> > >> > Edgardo
>
> > >> > --
> > >> > Twitter developer documentation and resources:
> > >>http://dev.twitter.com/doc
> > >> > API updates via Twitter:http://twitter.com/twitterapi
> > >> > Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
> > >>http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
> > >> > Change your membership to this group:
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk?hl=en
>
> > >>  --
> > >> Twitter developer documentation and resources:http://dev.twitter.com/doc
> > >> API updates via Twitter:http://twitter.com/twitterapi
> > >> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
> > >>http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
> > >> Change your membership to this group:
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk?hl=en
>
> > >  --
> > > Twitter developer documentation and resources:http://dev.twitter.com/doc
> > > API updates via Twitter:http://twitter.com/twitterapi
> > > Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
> > >http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
> > > Change your membership to this group:
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk?hl=en

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk?hl=en

Reply via email to