This is very clear now, thanks for the advice.

On 16 November 2010 22:17, Taylor Singletary
<taylorsinglet...@twitter.com>wrote:

> One way to approach this problem:
>
> For each user's tweets that you want to track -- do you want to require
> that user to be an authenticated member of your site and opt-in to having
> you track their tweets, likely in the context of providing a (mostly
> private) Twitter client experience on the web for them? If the answer here
> is "yes", then Site Streams is a fantastic choice.
>
> However, I think you want to track the publicly created tweets of arbitrary
> users, whether they are members of your site or not. In this case, Brian's
> original recommendation to utilize the standard Streaming API's track /
> follow facilities is best.
>
> Like all of our APIs, it does have limitations -- only public statuses are
> returned, and you can "only" track up to 5,000 users without enhanced
> streaming permissions. It's best not to worry about requesting additional
> access levels until you need them. There are some other limitations around
> tweet velocity and relative percentages of the firehose, but the use case
> you've detailed here suggests you'd likely not him them.
>
> Taylor
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Neil Sheth <sheth.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Taylor,
>>
>> We are pulling in tweets into our site for various twitter users and
>> displaying their tweets.  The part that confuses me is whether we need to
>> build the API stream that Brian described in his email (Statuses/Filter) or
>> the site_streams API as mentioned by our developers?  Also, just to check if
>> we don't build the site_streams one, is this something we're going to have
>> to build anyway at a later stage?
>>
>> Regards
>> Neil
>>
>> On 16 November 2010 21:55, Taylor Singletary <
>> taylorsinglet...@twitter.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Neil,
>>>
>>> What are you particularly trying to accomplish with your Twitter
>>> Integration? How are tweets used in the application? What APIs were you
>>> leveraging when you were planning a REST-only solution?
>>>
>>> While Site Streams is "officially beta" right now, it's very reliable --
>>> but whether it's the right solution for you really depends on what you're
>>> looking to accomplish.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Taylor
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Neil <sheth.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have previously raised a request to obtain twitter whitelisting but
>>>> have been told by Twitter (Brian) that we have built the wrong
>>>> solution.  Our developers are struggling to understand which solution
>>>> they need to build for our site www.mystweet.com in order to get
>>>> whitelisted.  They have stated that they are unsure which one to
>>>> choose:
>>>>
>>>> 1)  http://dev.twitter.com/pages/site_streams   - twitter recommend
>>>> this for the kind of solution which we want to implement, but this is
>>>> still in beta
>>>>
>>>> 2)  http://dev.twitter.com/pages/user_streams_suggestions  - but this
>>>> is not what they would allow for our case.
>>>>
>>>> Can you please advise what solution needs to be built?  We're hoping
>>>> to correct this before they go on their holidays
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PREVIOUS EMAIL FROM BRIAN
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jessel,
>>>> Sorry about this! There is currently an issue that removes the
>>>> "rejection reason" from some whitelist emails. Your requests have
>>>> rejected because we encourage you to use our Streaming API instead to
>>>> accomplish your purposes. As described onhttp://
>>>> dev.twitter.com/pages/streaming_api_methods
>>>> , you may use the statuses/filter method with the follow parameter to
>>>> receive a real-time stream of tweets from all the users you're
>>>> interested in. I apologize for any inconvenience this causes to your
>>>> project.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your understanding,
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Twitter developer documentation and resources:
>>>> http://dev.twitter.com/doc
>>>> API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
>>>> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
>>>> http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
>>>> Change your membership to this group:
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Twitter developer documentation and resources:
>>> http://dev.twitter.com/doc
>>> API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
>>> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
>>> http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
>>> Change your membership to this group:
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
>> API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
>> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
>> http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
>> Change your membership to this group:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>>
>
>  --
> Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
> API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
> http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
> Change your membership to this group:
> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk

Reply via email to