Search API rate limiting is not handled like other endpoints of the REST
API. As explained on http://dev.twitter.com/pages/rate-limiting#search, the
Search Rate Limit isn't made public to discourage unnecessary search usage.

Concerning the User-Agent, use something like "Your App Name - Version" (it
should be unique). Including an HTTP Referer (i.e. "about page" of your app)
is also a good practice :)

Arnaud / @rno <http://twitter.com/rno>



On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:05 PM, sduffer <shwetha.ga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Team,
> I am using grackle client to retrieve results from search api of
> twitter. i am passing oauth parameter to retrieve 350 requests per
> hour. Though I am doing it right it still retrieves me only 150
> requests per hour. I tried to verify account/verify_credentials and
> found i am passing the correction oauth params.
> Here is my dev code with Grackle gem
>
>  twitter_client = Grackle::Client.new(:auth=>{
>       :type=>:oauth,
>       :consumer_key=>'key,
>           :consumer_secret=>'secret',
>       :token=> 'token',
>           :token_secret=> 'xxxx'
>     },
>         :headers => {"User-Agent" => "example.com"})
>
> I am passing User-Agent as I have seen it mentioned in rate limit api
> if it is correctly passed we can retrieve 350 requests per hour.
> Could you let me know if I am mssing something or should pass anything
> with Grackle api call to get 350 requests per hour using oauth.
>
> --
> Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
> API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
> http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
> Change your membership to this group:
> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk

Reply via email to