----- Original Message ----- From: "Francois Piette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 12:30 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] NO_ADV_MT symbol
>> > IMO it is better design to have all access to a given >> > component from only one thread. And in that case, you can >> > define NO_ADV_MT to have better performances because you >> > avoid using a critical section. >> >> Thank you, this answers my questions. >> >> I use 2 servers and some clients in same exe, but seperate threads. >> Atually >> all is controlled from main, but only by posting messages, so no threads >> or >> components in them is touched from outside the thread. And no >> sockets/components is switched from one thread to another. >> >> I will then define the NO_ADV_MT and I will get improved performance? > > You should. Improvement will be significant if you have a slow processor > and a fast network. It will > be neglectible if you have a fast processor and slow network. > negligible :) -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
