Hello Ian, Yes I have faced this problem before. Not exactly remembering how did I passed it but creating a fresh package would help (IMO).
Best Regards, SubZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Tuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <twsocket@elists.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 6:16 PM Subject: [twsocket] C++ Builder - bcbie60 problem > Hi. I've seen this question asked before, but didn't see a solution > posted > in the archives. > > I've just compiled the latest beta of ICS, and when I attempt to install > the > packages, I get a warning that BCB can not install the package because > bcbie60 already contains the unit shdocvw_ocx. Has anyone seen this > before? > Any ideas at resolving it? > > Thanks, > Ian > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:00 AM > To: twsocket@elists.org > Subject: TWSocket Digest, Vol 140, Issue 4 > > Send TWSocket mailing list submissions to > twsocket@elists.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than > "Re: Contents of TWSocket digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Bug in SmtpProt.pas (DZ-Jay) > 2. Re: Bug in SmtpProt.pas (Bj?rnar Nielsen) > 3. Re: Speed and buffered file stream (Arno Garrels) > 4. Re: Bug in SmtpProt.pas (Arno Garrels) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 06:35:02 -0400 > From: DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug in SmtpProt.pas > To: ICS support mailing <twsocket@elists.org> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > > On Oct 26, 2005, at 06:06, Arno Garrels wrote: > >>> >>> So the subject arrives as one continuous line of 1000+ characters? >>> And >>> the SMPT server permits this? Strange. I'll take your word for it, >>> as I have no access to Outlook 2003 to test. >> >> Some mail servers reformat invalid headers and mime messages, with >> sometimes very strange results. Also some MTA's would drop the >> connection on receiving very long lines since they assume a buffer >> overrun attack. > > That's what I was alluding at; I was assuming he meant that the message > would arrive intact with the entire subject line without breaks or > truncation. > >> One note on OE 6, it truncates the subject line at 266 chars silently. > > Outlook 2000 does the same thing, and it won't let you enter a subject > line > longer than 256 characters (but it split it with <CRLF>+<TAB> after every > 74 > chars.) > > dZ. > > -- > DZ-Jay [TeamICS] > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:52:03 +0200 > From: Bj?rnar Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug in SmtpProt.pas > To: "'ICS support mailing'" <twsocket@elists.org> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > >> >> That's what I was alluding at; I was assuming he meant that >> the message would arrive intact with the entire subject line >> without breaks or truncation. > > It does, but I can't write more than 256 chars in the subject-line. The > subject is kept as a single line, no splits. The subject is sent this way > and I receive it back from the mailserver the same way. > > Regards Bj?rnar > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:03:07 +0200 > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Speed and buffered file stream > To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote: >>> I've uploaded a tiny buffered file stream class as well >>> as a simple test program. It is amazing fast when small >>> chunks are read/written. Seeking is slower than TFileStream :( >> >> I'll try in one of my applications, but it won't be until next week. >> >> For the FTP server, I often have multiple PCs downloading the same >> files, in some cases 30 or 40 megs. With the normal TFileStream, >> presumably Windows will be effectively buffering the file once, and each >> separate stream will be reading from common windows buffers, in the >> normal read chunks specified by the server. I've never really >> understood whether this was efficient, or just simple. >> >> So what are the implications of buffering the same file multiple times? >> Presumably just the extra memory for the buffer? > > You save a lot of API calls. It depends on the ratio of block size and > buffer size. The SmtpCli reads files byte by byte hence it benefits from > a buffered stream enormously. > >> >> I have a couple of special files that are read thousands of times of >> day, both less than 1 meg that I could keep in a memory stream for >> efficiency. > > I think that's the fasted way of caching. > >> >> Angus > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:26:12 +0200 > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug in SmtpProt.pas > To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Bj?rnar Nielsen wrote: >>> That's what I was alluding at; I was assuming he meant that >>> the message would arrive intact with the entire subject line >>> without breaks or truncation. >> >> It does, but I can't write more than 256 chars in the subject-line. The >> subject is kept as a single line, no splits. The subject is sent this way >> and I receive it back from the mailserver the same way. > > That's an old bug in OE, you should not copy M$ bugs but wrap the > subject line. BTW: I think having ~1000 chars for the subject line > is far enough, or do you know a client that would display such long > subjects properly? > > Arno Garrels > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list > please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket > Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be > > End of TWSocket Digest, Vol 140, Issue 4 > **************************************** > > > -- > To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list > please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket > Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
