Ah ! OK.

--
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'ICS support mailing'" <twsocket@elists.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] TCP question


> The HTTP server in ICS will handle receiving the whole request before you
> handle it.  You can ignore buffering if you are just using the http server
> component.
>
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Kris Leech
> Sent: 03 September 2006 11:38
> To: ICS support mailing
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] TCP question
>
> With the HTTP Server though you will get the whole HTTP request even if
> it has been split up in to multiple packets at the TCP level?
>
> Markus Humm wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>if a client on a LAN sends a packet with e.g. 512 Bytes and TCP splits
>>it up internaly to e.g. 4x128 Bytes will the receiver get 4x the
>>OnDataAvailable event, or 1x with the whole 512 Byte?
>>
>>So needs the sender to have a larger buffer to be able to concatenate
>>such packets before he can check and process them? if yes, has anybody a
>>ringbuffer implementation he would share? Otherwise I'm toying with the
>>idea to use a string as buffer so I can add chars and delete some from
>>the beginning of the buffer as needed, but I don't know whether memory
>>fragmentation is a issue here (D2006 with FastMM).
>>
>>Greetings
>>
>>Markus
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be 

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Reply via email to