Some more tests (modified buffer size for the 2nd test) ICS: ~23s, 377 x 8KB, 55-60ms between packets: http://pastebin.com/Uq5mphUH ICS @ 64KB: ~22s, 48 x 64KB, 450-470ms between packets: http://pastebin.com/wTat71Qe SYN: ~6s, 49 x 64KB, 110-120ms between packets: http://pastebin.com/g5svt11P Indy: ~9s, 95 x 32KB, 70-80ms between packets: http://pastebin.com/Dt2PydTR
Even with a larger buffer it's still as slow. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:01 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > I updated the FTP client buffers to 32K several years ago for better > performance. > > Yep this was 2011 and it made a huge difference for me. > > http://marc.info/?l=twsocket&m=131146591403948&w=2 > > And your response: > > Log: > - Added published property DataSocketSndBufSize and public property > DataSocketRcvBufSize. Increase DataSocketSndBufSize in order to > make uploads faster. Both values default to value 8192 which is the > default winsock size. > > > http://marc.info/?l=twsocket&m=131152163805666&w=2 > > > > -- > To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list > please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket > Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be > -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
