On Aug 17, 2005, at 7:41 AM, Pratik wrote:
>
> Probably, there can be a 'base_url' or 'url_format' parameter in
> configuration file to derive that.
No configuration files!
The logical thing to do would be to have a base_url in the blogs
table, and then default to blog_id 1 when the incoming URL fails to
match any of the base_urls.
> I believe it's better idea for typo multiuser to be an independant
> sister project of typo. As multi-user blog doesn't really sound like
> typo's main goal. Plus, I think there are many more better things for
> lead typo developers to implement.
The problem with this is that multi-blog patches will be *really*
invasive. That means that it'll be very hard to maintain an out-of-
tree multiblog patch. Either the patch will rot and need major work
to get it to apply to each new Typo release, or the multi-blog
version will fork off and become its own project.
Given this, we'd almost certainly be best off having multi-blog
support in the main Typo tree, if we're going to do it at all.
Scott
From typo at isolated-designs.net Wed Aug 17 17:29:04 2005
From: typo at isolated-designs.net (Justin Palmer)
Date: Wed Aug 17 17:24:03 2005
Subject: [typo] Multiple users
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gonna chime in here.
I find multi-blog support for the core Typo project to be feature bloat
myself. 9.5 times out of 10 there will be 1 blogger or one blog with
many bloggers blogging on the same
blog (say that 5 times fast!). Don't you think the multi-blog feature
would only be useful to a small minority of our users and not the 95%
majority?
Cheers,
-Justin
Scott Laird wrote:
>
> On Aug 17, 2005, at 7:41 AM, Pratik wrote:
>
>>
>> Probably, there can be a 'base_url' or 'url_format' parameter in
>> configuration file to derive that.
>
>
> No configuration files!
>
> The logical thing to do would be to have a base_url in the blogs
> table, and then default to blog_id 1 when the incoming URL fails to
> match any of the base_urls.
>
>> I believe it's better idea for typo multiuser to be an independant
>> sister project of typo. As multi-user blog doesn't really sound like
>> typo's main goal. Plus, I think there are many more better things for
>> lead typo developers to implement.
>
>
> The problem with this is that multi-blog patches will be *really*
> invasive. That means that it'll be very hard to maintain an out-of-
> tree multiblog patch. Either the patch will rot and need major work
> to get it to apply to each new Typo release, or the multi-blog
> version will fork off and become its own project.
>
> Given this, we'd almost certainly be best off having multi-blog
> support in the main Typo tree, if we're going to do it at all.
>
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> Typo-list mailing list
> Typo-list@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
>
>
>
