On Nov 20, 2005, at 1:28 AM, Victor Jalencas wrote: > > Well, while I think typo should honor the date sent by an XML-RPC > client, I think that whether publishing it or not is at least open for > discussion. I don't necessarily interpret the semantics of a > future-dated post as you seem to do. Where does it say that a > future-dated post does not have to appear until that date?
1. The XMLRPC future-date problem is a bug. Can someone please file it? 2. The "future-dated post" semantics are pretty well established with Movable Type, etc. It'd be nice to support them, but our cache doesn't make this very easy. I'd gladly accept a patch that does the easy side of things--ignore future-dated articles when showing posts. If someone can fix that, then I'll finish some cache work that I've been doing, and I think we'll be able to make it work. Scott
