But isn't it recommended to use a frozen version of Rails, at least when using shared hosting. If most Typo users use frozen Rails the size of the Typo distribution wouldn't matter that much.
But if there's not that much hassle supporting multiple Rails version I guess it's not worth it. /Jonas --- [email protected] wrote: Because Rails is much larger then Typo, and we'd rather not make Typo grow > that much larger if we can avoid it. We can nail Typo to specific Rails > versions (and we probably will for releases from now on), but I don't think > that distributing Rails with Typo solves many problems. > > > Scott > > On 28 Mar 2006 19:57:45 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've asked it before, but got no answer (that I can recall): why doesn't > > Typo > > contain a frozen version of Rails so that everyone runs the same version? > > > > > > (That doesn't solve the problem with incompatibilities with Rails 1.1 but > > I think there would be less problems) > > > > /Jonas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > --- [email protected] > > wrote: > > So, it's out. What do we do? > > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Typo-list mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Typo-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Typo-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list > > _______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
