Hi! Christopher Schnell wrote: > Some more thoughts on how it might be possible to improve documentation > for extensions: > > With a colleague of mine, I had the idea to build up a "basic review > team". This team would review every new uploaded extension manually on: > * Weather it has a manual > * If the manual is useful > * If the source code is compliant with the T3 coding guidelines > > Based on that review there could be a new flag in TER, something like > "Approved by QA Team". This has nothing to do with the work of the > security team, which is much harder. > > Based on this approval, it would be easier to decide for users, which > ext is worth considering. Additionally, there could be a second checkbox > in the EM to only display results that are approved. So we would have > three steps: "unreviewed/unapproved", "passed basic review" and "passed > security review". > > What do you think?
Great idea! I think someone tried to organize ext reviews but this initiative is dead as well. So you may pick it up :) But be sure that you really can do it: it can be over 100 exts uploaded daily. -- Dmitry Dulepov TYPO3 core team Web: http://typo3bloke.net/ Skype: callto:liels_bugs "Nothing is impossible. There are only limits to our knowledge" _______________________________________________ TYPO3-english mailing list TYPO3-english@lists.netfielders.de http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english