Dmitry Dulepov schrieb: > Hi! > > Stephan Petzl wrote: >> oh, never thought of this... maybee because i m writing an non TYPO3 php >> application at the moment where i scale images too, and i never realised >> any artefacts. >> where exactly are the quality differences? > > Quite a lot. ImageMagick generally creates better JPEGs that GD. I have no > idea why but I tired to compare once: same settings different quality. It is > especially visible you have to resize a 8mpix image to a 450px width image > and save as 60% quality JPEG. >
ok, thanks... there are actually a lot of php developers who are not aware of this fact, good to know... anyway- would be cool if TYPO3 would work without IM out of the box. BR Stephan _______________________________________________ TYPO3-english mailing list TYPO3-english@lists.netfielders.de http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
