Yes, agree, mystery machine - we can only guess! ;-) > some information there is better than none!?
I don´t believe so. You can´t make meta data that correspond to all your visible pages. If so they aren´t specific enough. About keywords and Google use of them I don´t have the answer. In my opinion I just would rather use my time and ressources in going through visible content and make that even better. 2009/6/11 Tyler Kraft <[email protected]> > > > > I disagree: Search engines look for meening, not just words. So if words > are > > copied it sends signal that all pages are alike. Which they are not on > your > > site - I guess? > > But surely some information there is better than none!? Even if the > keywords are repeated it still provides information and therefore > context and meaning of the site, no? > > > > > Perhaps search engines still lack competence in discovering > > "meaninglessness" but they get better and better. Therefor - to be ready > for > > the future - don´t make "bad content" (which duplicated content is). > +1 > > > > BTW - keywords are - as far as I know - not values or used by Google. In > > IMHO it´s not worth the work of creating and updating them. > > My understanding is that they don't get used by google, but it still > likes to see them there, and gives you a checkmark for having them - if > that makes sense. Apparently it all contributes to having well formed > pages, etc. > > Google... the mystery machine! ;-) > _______________________________________________ > TYPO3-english mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english > _______________________________________________ TYPO3-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
