Hi Bjorn, It's true for release using name and not a sequence number. TYPO3 v3.8 -> 4.0 -> 4.1 -> 4.2 -> 4.3 -> ... -> 4.7 -> 6.0
It's not a big problem but it is an oddity. regards Federico Il giorno 05/mar/2012, alle ore 14:57, Björn Pedersen ha scritto: > Am 05.03.2012 14:35, schrieb Federico Bernardin: >> Hi Jigal Il giorno 05/mar/2012, alle ore 13:44, Jigal van Hemert ha >> scritto: >> >> >> I think it is wrong to leave a hole in the number of versions. For >> those unfamiliar with TYPO3 (or very little) is not clear why one >> version has been omitted. I personally would continue in the version >> number and the future major release of TYPO3 should be version 5 and >> not 6. >> > > Well , Why would that be so much of a problem? We are used to strange > changing version numbers on other major software as well (95/NT4,98, > NT5, 2000, XP, Vista, 7). Normally you would use the lastest version for > new projects, and old projects will upgrade on demand. > > Björn > > _______________________________________________ > TYPO3-english mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english _______________________________________________ TYPO3-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
