Il 05/03/2012 17:25, Mathias Bolt Lesniak, LiliO Design ha scritto:
Hi Markus!

I'm both a developer and business (i.e. marketing, client relations) guy, so 
I'm seeing this from both sides. I've been working with TYPO3 since 3.6.x.

I think this question is closely related to the community (or the lack of it), 
and the version issue can't be discussed without looking at things more broadly.

The T3A clearly needs to take a step back and look at itself from the outside. 
The new web site is late, the new CMS is late, people don't feel they can trust 
what they hear, etc. I love FLOW3, but I've stopped directing clients to 
typo3.com or .org (I use t3blog.com instead)! I believe rewriting the TYPO3 
core (into FLOW3/Phoenix) is the right thing, but I believe the focus is too 
much on the future, and too little on what needs to be ready right now. A 
colleague from the Drupal side says TYPO3 seems too perfectionistic. So 
perfectionistic, in fact, that nothing seems ever to be finished. Food for 
thought. :-)

This seems to be reflected in the communication too: Decisions must be clearly 
communicated. As others have mentioned, Robert's blog is not the place for that 
kind of communication, but it's not only Robert's task to make sure the 
information gets out.

Xavier's reply to Milicev's e-mail another place in this thread is symptomatic 
of a different kind of issue:
     Question: "How to explain to the 62 year old guy, director of the board, where 
v5 vaporized"
     Answer: "Just point him to the articles..."
Sorry, but that's plain disrespectful! No TYPO3 agency is going to live long if 
it just asks the clients to read these kind of articles. TYPO3 is there not 
ultimately for the agencies, but for their clients. With Xavier's attitude, 
TYPO3 will die: Agencies won't be able to sell the product, no matter how good 
it is.


To conclude, these are important points for me:
     - Keeping on changing names and numbers is bad PR. Don't do it!
     - A clear five year plan is needed for all TYPO3 related projects.
     - Phoenix must also be called TYPO3, or people will think it's two 
different things.

People must think thay are different things!

I feel Flow3/extbase to be a big mistake, both as architectural and team visions, so it would be more correct if people which loves Flow3/Extbase makes his own CMS, instead of breaking a working one.

So please, keep TYPO3 away from FLOW3, make your PHOENIX/FLOW3 CMS and we'll stay all happy.

Regards,

Tonino

     - Version numbers should continue straight into Phoenix. (No Phoenix 1.0, 
please.)
     - Like from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X the switch to Phoenix should be the next 
natural step, and maintaining both cores should only be done for a finite 
number of years.
     - Resources should be spent on making TYPO3 look better from the outside. 
(More money to PR)
     - Although TYPO3 is "free" I'm not against paying a voluntary fee per site 
to sponsor TYPO3 development and PR, as long as projects don't linger in development for 
ever (so I can show clients what they pay for).

I agree with you, Markus: It's now or never!



PS! As a member I also have a job to do, but although I travel to Switzerland 
more than most Norwegians, I've never managed to attend a GA, where I imagine 
many important issues are discussed. I've refrained from voting because I feel 
I lack the ability to suck up all the information that is necessary to make up 
an informed opinion. It's hard to keep an overview from here. I'm sorry about 
that, but I know I'm not alone with this problem. I'd like to be more involved, 
that's for sure. If I only knew there was a process on changing the version 
number, I hope I would have been good enough to leave my feedback before it was 
too late.


Best wishes

Mathias Bolt Lesniak
LiliO - www.lilio.no
[email protected]



On 5. mars 2012, at 12:46, Markus Lindbergh wrote:

Hi All,

I would like to hear your opinion about this situation.
Both from dev and business side.

I am in TYPO3 world for 4 years now partially as developer, partially
as entrepreneur ... and I would really like to hear what is the strategy of
core team and all this version v4 / v5 / v6 thing.

I feel it is now or never for this CMS.

 From my side, v4 to v5 migration path was good but too slow and confusing
for lot of developers...and still I do not know how typo3 will look like in
year or two. Will we have 4.xyz thing or finally v5

BR,

ml

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Boris Hinzer<[email protected]>wrote:

Hello everybody,

I would like to open up this thread to move the discussions referring to
this article: http://buzz.typo3.org/people/**xavier-perseguers/article/**
typo3-60-at-the-corner-how-is-**it-possible/<http://buzz.typo3.org/people/xavier-perseguers/article/typo3-60-at-the-corner-how-is-it-possible/>away
 from
buzz.typo3.org to a place where it's not that visible to a broad audience.

IMHO the discussions now going on as comments underneath the buzz article
could seriously harm TYPO3.

Best regards,

Boris Hinzer
______________________________**_________________
TYPO3-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-**english<http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english>

_______________________________________________
TYPO3-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
_______________________________________________
TYPO3-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english



--
------------------------------------------------------------
        Inter@zioni            Interazioni di Antonio Nati
   http://www.interazioni.it      [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
TYPO3-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english

Reply via email to