Hi Mark,

Well, I don't wanna do a JOIN for now, as I am interested first in the "uid"s of the tt_content elements. Later, I can just get the field "image" and iterate through the file references.

The problem I see with the GROUP BY / HAVING clauses is that I can't find any function that manages this inside the repository class. Just this "raw sql" statement() function.

Another solution is like you said, to use a Typoscript object, but I would like to avoid this.

Regards,
Sergio

On 14/07/14 11:12, Mark Boland wrote:
Hi Sergio,

there is no problem with GROUP BY / HAVING clauses in TYPO3, is there? And
you don¹t need the subquery as far as I can see. You can do a JOIN with
the FAL tables for textpic CEs.

Cheers

Mark

Am 14.07.14 10:43 schrieb "Sergio Catalá" unter <[email protected]>:

Hi Mark,

Thanks for your answer.
I need a GROUP BY and HAVING, because I want to get the first image for
the latest created tt_content element (normally an Image element with
several images) but from certain pids. And I don't want to display two
latest tt_content elements from the same pid, just the latest tt_content
of every pid.

Regards,
Sergio


On 13/07/14 16:42, Mark Boland wrote:
Hi Sergio

Why using GROUP BY and HAVING? WHERE should be enough and don't forget
to use deleted = 0 AND hidden = 0 to exclude hidden or deleted records.

You could achieve this with a pure Typoscript .select in a CONTENT
element.

Cheers
Mark

Am 13.07.2014 um 14:33 schrieb Sergio Catalá <[email protected]>:

Hi list,

I've built a new extension that maps tt_content table. I would like to
get the images from the latest created tt_content elements.

I would like to transform this SQL sentence:

     SELECT tt_content.image
     FROM (SELECT * FROM tt_content ORDER BY tt_content.crdate DESC)
tt_content
     GROUP BY tt_content.pid, tt_content.sys_language_uid
     HAVING tt_content.pid in (2,3,4,5) AND tt_content.sys_language_uid
= 0
     LIMIT 0,4

into a QueryResultInterface for my content repository.

But I am not sure if I can use GROUP and HAVING clausules with
existing functions for the $query.
I saw I can use a "raw sql" through statement() function, but I don't
want to use that.

Is this possible?

Thanks in advance,
Sergio

_______________________________________________
TYPO3-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
_______________________________________________
TYPO3-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
_______________________________________________
TYPO3-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english

_______________________________________________
TYPO3-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english

_______________________________________________
TYPO3-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english

Reply via email to