On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > > ==> And this is not a good approach, you want the S/W to use the > > first 256 kB to store initial boot, U-boot and environment. > > The AT91SAM9 chips will use the first 8 kB sector > > for the AT91bootstrap, and that should have protection separate > > from U-Boot code. AVR32 boot ROM will boot from a higher address and use > > the 8 kB sector at address zero as environment. > > Both will need to have a S/W partitioning scheme added with > > separate protection for each partition. > > This partioning scheme exists today. > > sorry, i didnt mean to imply i thought this limitation was something to be > written in stone. i understand perfectly why you would want this > flexibility, so i can take a look. rather than making general statements, > can you please provide a concrete list of all relevant examples you know > of.
Ulf: can you at least follow up to this so i have a goal to work towards ? maybe i'll demand some sample parts if you want support ! :) -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
